Boston Trash Elite

March 6th, 2008 by Harrumpher Leave a reply »

Hoi polloi, bow before us! We are the big-cart recyclers.Menio and recycle bin

First, let us note that someone in the City of Boston Recycling Program has brass ‘nads and is not afraid of ridiculing his mayorality, The Thomas Menino. Our flyer today has the accompanying image (click for larger, more risible size). If Tony Soprano were advertising his waste-management companies, he might include such a picture with one of his lieutenants. Here Tommy Shoulder Pads makes you an offal you can’t refuse.

The flyer headline is THANK YOU, BIG-CART RECYCLERS. That would be we, in our case the elite Jamaica Plain newspaper sorters, jar rinsers, and cardboard box folders. Stand in awe, you wasteful wastrels.

Our 14-year-old rolls this grumbling omnivore to the curb from the back of the house every Wednesday evening. The big-cart is, well, big, many more cubic feet than he has and two-thirds as tall. You can see how high it is on Da Mare. If he had a bellybutton, it would be that high.

We can plug most non-organic stuff in it. Being UUs in JP, we, of course, have a compost bin in the back to turn plant matter into soil. So there.

We’ve gone from three cans of trash a week to one or fewer. We still have the supermarket packaging, like foam meat packaging that can’t go into the big cart.

Tommy’s flyer says our “PILOT PROGRAM ENDS WITH RESOUNDING SUCCESS; PLEASE KEEP YOUR CARD AND CONTINUE TO USE IT.”

That’s good. I’m pretty sure the big cart is not recyclable.

Anyway, they measured mid-May to mid-November —recycling up 52% from 2006 to 2007, and trash for the same period down 20%. Those figures are illogical, but what the heck? More important, of the 2,300 households in the big-cart elite, we recycled more, had less trash, found recycling easier, our streets cleaner and the cart was the right size.

It’s a miracle of modern trash…proven right here in JP. Plus, who’d argue with a tough guy mayor hiding behind his big cart? You’ll recycle and you’ll like it!

Share
Advertisement

2 Responses

  1. Spock says:

    Illogical? Just means (assuming total waste stays the same) that there was 2.6 times as much trash as recycling to begin with.

  2. Harrumpher says:

    No, looking at either cubic feet or weight, I think those don’t computer. There tonnage was substantially different, like a 17% differential, lower. Unless JP households suddenly bought that much less stuff or stored it in basements, pantries and closets, it doesn’t work.

    The concept is good and I buy into it. We recycle all we can.

Leave a Reply