<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston Trash Elite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://harrumpher.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://harrumpher.com/?p=209</link>
	<description>Commentary from a Boston crank.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:15:58 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harrumpher</title>
		<link>http://harrumpher.com/?p=209&#038;cpage=1#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrumpher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrumpher.com/?p=209#comment-390</guid>
		<description>No, looking at either cubic feet or weight, I think those don&#039;t computer.  There tonnage was substantially different, like a 17% differential, lower. Unless JP households suddenly bought that much less stuff or stored it in basements, pantries and closets, it doesn&#039;t work.

The concept is good and I buy into it. We recycle all we can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, looking at either cubic feet or weight, I think those don&#8217;t computer.  There tonnage was substantially different, like a 17% differential, lower. Unless JP households suddenly bought that much less stuff or stored it in basements, pantries and closets, it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>The concept is good and I buy into it. We recycle all we can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spock</title>
		<link>http://harrumpher.com/?p=209&#038;cpage=1#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Spock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://harrumpher.com/?p=209#comment-389</guid>
		<description>Illogical?  Just means (assuming total waste stays the same) that there was 2.6 times as much trash as recycling to begin with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Illogical?  Just means (assuming total waste stays the same) that there was 2.6 times as much trash as recycling to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
